Sec 498A Abuse: Supreme Court’s Stand on Unnecessary Allegations

Best Divorce Lawyers for Criminal Case Legal Opinion in Chennai India

In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court has weighed in on the contentious issue surrounding sec 498A of IPC. Moreover, This deals with cruelty against married women. The apex court, while addressing a criminal writ petition, made noteworthy observations on the abuse of this provision. The case involved the quashing of an FIR filed by the husband and his relatives against allegations brought forward by the wife. The court, led by Justices S. Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari, expressed strong disapproval of unnecessary and omnibus allegations. Meanwhile, This emphasizes the need to discourage such actions for the sake of justice and the integrity of the legal process. This article delves into the court’s perspective, highlighting the concerns raised and the implications of its observations on sec 498A cases.

Unnecessary and Omnibus Allegation to Husband and Relatives is an Abuse of sec 498A of IPC Best Divorce Lawyers in Chennai 24*7 | Buddha Family Court

Unnecessary and Omnibus Allegation in sec 498A IPC: A Supreme Court Perspective


The Supreme Court, in a criminal writ petition, quashes an FIR filed by the husband and relatives against allegations made by the wife under sec 498A of IPC.

The court strongly condemns the revengeful intent behind lodging the FIR, deeming it an abuse of the legal process and an attempt to harass the petitioner.

Concerns of the Apex Court:

Expressing concern over the misuse of sec 498A as a tool for personal grudges, the SC emphasizes that prosecuting based on general and omnibus allegations is unacceptable.

Judicial Observation:

Justices S. Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari caution against the scars left by criminal trials. Of course, this discourages excessive and serious actions that force relatives through unnecessary tribulations.

Read More

Quashing the FIR:

The Apex Court, while ensuring justice, quashes the FIR. In fact, This prevented the appellants from undergoing the tribulation of a criminal trial based on vague and omnibus allegations.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow by Email